LaPierre argued that our society is stalked by unknown numbers of monsters, potential mass murders like Adam Lanza. Then he said this: Even
if we could somehow identify future Adam Lanzas, "that wouldn't even
begin to address the much larger and more lethal criminal class:
Killers, robbers, rapists and drug gang members who have spread like
cancer in every community in this country."
The "criminal class"
sentence is key. In LaPierre's mind, the world is divided between
law-abiding citizens and dangerous criminals. Citizens and criminals
form two separate and discrete categories. The criminals pose a threat;
if the citizens do not go armed against the threat, they will be
victimized by the threat.
I know people who carry handguns with them wherever they go, and for just the reason described by LaPierre.
Now let's take a look at the real world of American gun ownership. The following incident occurred in August:
"A man was shot in the
face 9 p.m. Friday in an altercation with a neighbor over barking dogs
on Atlas Street," Troy Police said.
"Police arrested David
George Keats, 73, of Troy [Michigan] and charged him with attempted
murder in the incident," according to a media release from the Troy
Police Department.
"According to police,
witnesses stated that the altercation began when Keats let his three
dogs outside and the dogs began to bark. According to the media release,
Keats' 52-year-old next door neighbor yelled at the dogs to be quiet
and kicked the fence. Keats then ran up to the victim, yelled, 'Don't
tell my dogs to shut up,' and began shooting at the victim.
"One bullet hit the man
in the face, piercing both cheeks, and four more shots were fired at the
victim as he was running away," according to the report.
The encounter between Keats and his neighbor ended nonlethally only by good luck. A shot in the face is a shot to kill.
Nor was this encounter aberrational. There's solid research to show that most so-called defensive gun uses are not really defensive at all.
In the late 1990s, teams
of researchers at the Harvard school of public health interviewed
dozens of people who had wielded a gun for self-defense. (In many cases,
the guns were not fired, but were simply brandished.) The researchers
pressed for the fullest description of exactly what happened. They then
presented the descriptions to five criminal court judges from three
states.
"The judges were told to
assume that the respondent had a permit to own and carry the gun and
had described the event honestly from his/her own perspective. The
judges were then asked to give their best guess whether, based on the
respondent's description of the incident, the respondent's use of the
gun was very likely legal, likely legal, as likely as not legal,
unlikely legal, or very unlikely legal."
Even on those two highly
favorable (and not very realistic) assumptions, the judges rated the
majority of the self-defensive gun uses as falling into one of the two
illegal categories.
The researchers concluded:
"Guns are used to
threaten and intimidate far more often than they are used in
self-defense. Most self-reported self-defense gun uses may well be
illegal and against the interests of society."
That certainly describes the Keats shooting. With a little Google searching, you can pull up dozens of similar incidents.
"Longview, Washington --
A man shot and killed his uncle during an argument at their apartment
complex late Friday night. ...'We heard a big bang,' said Ron Nelson,
who lives a few apartments down...Nelson said the men were fighting over
a hat and a cell phone."
Now that so many
Americans carry weapons when they go out of the home, shooting incidents
can occur anywhere, including very commonly the road. Another recent
incident: In Pensacola, Florida, in October a man in a Jeep Cherokee cut
off another car. A roadway confrontation followed, the two cars
stopped, and the Jeep owner emerged to shoot the other driver in the
knee. He was arrested this past week.
In these cases, and
thousands like them each and every year, it is not so clear who is the
"good guy" exercising responsible self-protection and who is the "bad
guy" who can only be deterred by an armed citizen.
But the guns in their
hands protected exactly nobody. They turned ordinary altercations into
murderous exchanges of fire. They brought wounds, death and criminal
prosecution where otherwise there would likely only have been angry
words or at worst, black eyes.
LaPierre's offers a
vision of American society as one unending replay of the worst scenes in
Charles Bronson's 1974 vigilante classic, "Death Wish."
The people most
victimized by this nightmare vision end up being the people who believe
it -- and who carry the weapons that kill or maim their neighbors, their
relatives, their spouses, and random passersby.
0 commentaires:
Enregistrer un commentaire